How Binance became a Hub for Hackers, Fraudsters and Drug Sellers

home Foren Microsoft Windows Mobile How Binance became a Hub for Hackers, Fraudsters and Drug Sellers

Schlagwörter: 

Ansicht von 1 Beitrag (von insgesamt 1)
  • Autor
    Beiträge
  • #168359
    meisolis363355
    Teilnehmer

    <br> Here in this article, we are going to look into the revenue-generating factors that a Binance clone script comprises. So, whenever you say that you want to mutual close your channel, the only one who is going to pay the fees for that is the party who initially opened that channel, so they don’t have an incentive, they really don’t want to overpay the fee. Bastien Teinturier: No, I don’t think so. So what’s really revolutionary I think about the whole math-based currency movement is that people have figured out a way that I can send an item of value from one entity to another entity securely, almost instantly, and without a middleman. So, since we all want to move to taproot, and this was one of the blocking points for taproot, that we didn’t have a good way of closing taproot channels and exchanging the nonce securely beforehand, I think everyone will just implement that version. So at some point, we added a small tweak to that to make it one round and a half of exchange, where the party who wants to close the channel sends a Type-Length-Value (TLV) saying, „I will accept any fee inside that range, and I am proposing that one“.
    Bastien Teinturier: Yeah, even though this creates also potential issues, because the commitment transaction right now, the fees are paid by the channel initiator. But the issue is that since this is automated, actually in implementations, it’s already decided from the start what fee you’re going to accept and what fee you’re going to reject, so this negotiation was not actually very useful, and it created a lot of issues between those that couldn’t agree on fees. So now, it’s going to be a very simple version of RBF, where the incentive should be properly aligned because only one party is paying the fees and they are the one proposing that RBF. Binance has done a lot in the short time it has been in the market to rightly earn its place as one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. And already, with only one side of a channel being able to send that message, it creates a lot of issues, because updating the fee of a commitment transaction while you have a lot of HTLCs in flight can actually make you deep into your<br>e<br>.
    That made no sense, and this makes a lot more sense to me. Goldman Sachs says it is „exploring“ a Bitcoin trading operation, and on Monday, two finance companies will launch Bitcoin futures contracts so that even more betting on the price can take place. As of this writing, all pools listed on the site-who represent more than half of the current network hash rate-have indicated that they will support activation. Although P2EP and Bustapay could end up being implemented by only a few wallets and services similar to the BIP70 payment protocol, there’s also chance they could end up being becoming as widely adopted as wallet support for BIP21 URI handlers. Singapore’s central bank recently announced that Binance may be in violation of the country’s Payment Services Act, prompting the crypto exchange to eliminate Singapore dollar trading pairs and payment options. Others like to be anonymous, but utilize another strategy: buying Bitcoin via non-anonymous methods such as a bank wire transfer, and then trying to anonymize their Bitcoin afterwards. However, the withdrawal fees differ, especially when bank transfers are concerned. Rusty’s proposal was that instead of creating one transaction and trying to negotiate the fees on it, we would actually create two transactions, one for the channel initiator, one for the non-channel initiator, where each one decides how much fees they’re ready to pay and what fees are taken from<br>i<br>utput.
    Therefore disallowing any one entity from altering or controlling the entire database. Coins protected by taproot may be spent either by satisfying one of the committed scripts or by simply providing a signature that verifies against the public key (allowing the script to be kept private). Pieter Wuille provides mathematical breakdowns for how private key information can be leaked when signing twice with the same public key using: the same nonces, simonhauville.com nonces with known offsets, and nonces with known factors. SAFU is an insurance fund that Binance can draw from in emergency situations such as hacks. While most NFT marketplaces are based on Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain is an upgrade of its predecessor. If you’d like to trade on Binance DEX, you’ll need to use BEP-2 tokens, while if you’d like to use dApps on BSC, you’ll need BEP-20 tokens. The workshops also provided engineers an opportunity to take part in the feedback process while these technologies are still in the proposal stage. Erlay is proposal to improve the bandwidth efficiency of relaying unconfirmed transactions between Bitcoin full nodes. If the community likes the proposal and decides to move ahead with it, Ethereum core developers will start working on the implementation to be included in a future upgr<br>to the network.

Ansicht von 1 Beitrag (von insgesamt 1)
  • Du musst angemeldet sein, um auf dieses Thema antworten zu können.